|
|
| Line 348: |
Line 348: |
| !Approval Status | | !Approval Status |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 5%; text-align:center" |<big>'''NET 4A'''</big> | | | style="width: 5%; text-align:center" |NET 5A |
| | | | | |
| | style="width: 20%" |Offer classes based on volunteer VSF priorities | | | style="width: 20%" |Maintain Standards |
| |Use the Annual Customer Service survey to schedule advanced classes based on volunteer interests. | | |‘Autonomy’ does not mean ‘chaos’. Continue to foster initiative, and reward integration of those efforts withing established NET policy and priorities. |
| | '''JVK note:''' '''Agreed, but not sure this belongs in a strategic plan if a strategic plan presupposes maintaining a status quo.''' |
| | | | | |
| | style="width: 15%; background-color: #B8F5D0; text-align: center; color: black" |<big>'''Proposed'''</big> | | | style="width: 15%; background-color: #B8F5D0; text-align: center; color: black" |<big>'''Proposed'''</big> |
| |- | | |- |
| | style="width: 5%; text-align:center" |<big>'''NET 4B'''</big> | | | style="width: 5%; text-align:center" |NET 5B |
| | | | | |
| |Recruit and train more NET trainers through Train the Trainer courses | | |Team Leader Training |
| | | | | |
| * Staff should continue to focus on training trainers, not delivering classes themselves. The latter is unsustainable. | | * Continue developing and deploying the well-received [[Team Development Arcs]]. |
|
| |
|
| * The upfront investment can be high, but so is the return. In the long term, volunteer’s willingness to instruct for reduced rates, and for free, constrain costs. | | * Find and deliver general leadership development training. |
|
| |
|
| * Ongoing management and vetting of instructors is critical, so that volunteers continue to know that training offered by PBEM is high quality. | | * Implement, directly or through FPN, a TL mentorship program. |
| | |
| * Address Instructor Constraints Develop and regularly offer a training about ‘How to Be an Excellent Instructor,’ separate from SME topic. Resources have been identified, but the project has not been a priority.
| |
| | |
| * Demonstrated success with this model:
| |
| ** VSF02 – Radio/RTLs
| |
| ** VSF08 – NET HSI Instructor cadre
| |
| ** VSF14 – Speakers Bureau
| |
| |
| |
| | style="width: 15%; background-color: #B8F5D0; text-align: center; color: black" |<big>'''Proposed'''</big>
| |
| |-
| |
| | style="width: 5%; text-align:center" |<big>'''NET 4C'''</big>
| |
| |
| |
| |Peer Instructor Network (PIN)
| |
| |
| |
| * Reassess feasibility.
| |
| | |
| * If retained, develop a new recruiting approach.
| |
| | |
| * Promote PIN for multi-team training (formerly NERF)
| |
| |
| |
| | style="width: 15%; background-color: #B8F5D0; text-align: center; color: black" |<big>'''Proposed'''</big>
| |
| |-
| |
| | style="width: 5%; text-align:center" |<big>'''NET 4D'''</big>
| |
| |
| |
| |Large-scale Exercises
| |
| |
| |
| * Continue integrating NET/BEECN into exercises, like IronOR.
| |
| | |
| * Continue CDEs, with inclusion of other Oregon CERTs.
| |
| | |
| * Conduct an overnight and multi-day exercise.
| |
| | | | | |
| | style="width: 15%; background-color: #B8F5D0; text-align: center; color: black" |<big>'''Proposed'''</big> | | | style="width: 15%; background-color: #B8F5D0; text-align: center; color: black" |<big>'''Proposed'''</big> |
