2023-2024 NET Program Realignment: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 279: Line 279:
'''A:''' There are two things to unpack here: hours/ATVs, and accommodation for persons with disabilities.
'''A:''' There are two things to unpack here: hours/ATVs, and accommodation for persons with disabilities.


'''<u>First, concerning logged hours and ATVs:</u>''' I want to be very clear about this: for at least ten years, active status in the NET program (e.g. indemnification) has been predicated on three things: 1.) Completing basic NET or CERT training; 2.) logging a minimum of twelve service hours each calendar year; and 3.) attending at least one team meeting each year. Not two of those and not one of those, or one of those and not two of those...'''''all three conditions need to be met.''''' Meeting those conditions satisfies the City's risk concerns for indemnifying an individual disaster response volunteer (and in my personal opinion, I would call that a surprisingly low threshold). It makes a disaster response volunteer a "deployable resource". This information is presented in Basic NET training, and is also in the [https://www.portland.gov/pbem/neighborhood-emergency-teams/documents/net-guidelines/download NET Guidelines], published online, which we encourage NET volunteers to read.
'''<u>First, concerning logged hours and ATVs:</u>''' I want to be very clear about this: for at least ten years, active status in the NET program (e.g. indemnification) has been predicated on three things: 1.) Completing basic NET or CERT training; 2.) logging a minimum of twelve service hours each calendar year; and 3.) attending at least one team meeting each year. <u>'''''All three'''''</u> '''''conditions need to be met.''''' Why? Meeting those conditions satisfies the City's risk concerns for indemnifying an individual disaster response volunteer (and in my personal opinion, I would call that a surprisingly low threshold). It makes a disaster response volunteer a "deployable resource". This information is presented in Basic NET training, and is also in the [https://www.portland.gov/pbem/neighborhood-emergency-teams/documents/net-guidelines/download NET Guidelines], published online, which we encourage NET volunteers to read.


Nonetheless, we have enforced those Guidelines loosely. Technically, if a volunteer doesn't meet those three conditions, we're supposed to place them on "Inactive" status. We didn't want to do that; we wanted to find a medial status between "Active NET" and "Inactive". That medial status is "ATV". A NET who is having trouble logging twelve hours a year can downshift to ATV status so we don't have to kick them out of the program. They can become a full NET again when they're ready to meet the requirements. It is true that an ATV is not indemnified (they are also not called up for central deployments). But we can't indemnify a volunteer who is not a deployable resource.
Nonetheless, we have enforced those Guidelines loosely. Technically, if a volunteer doesn't meet those three conditions, we're supposed to place them on "Inactive" status. We didn't want to do that; we wanted to find a medial status between "Active NET" and "Inactive". That medial status is "ATV". A NET who is having trouble logging twelve hours a year can downshift to ATV status so we don't have to kick them out of the program. They can become a full NET again when they're ready to meet the requirements. It is true that an ATV is not indemnified (they are also not called up for central deployments). But we can't indemnify a volunteer who is not a deployable resource.
Line 288: Line 288:


'''If we're not doing a good job creating a welcoming program, I'm ready to own that and work on it.''' In the survey will be a question welcoming folks to a NET/Disabilities roundtable to talk about it. I'll schedule an initial meeting for shortly after January 1.
'''If we're not doing a good job creating a welcoming program, I'm ready to own that and work on it.''' In the survey will be a question welcoming folks to a NET/Disabilities roundtable to talk about it. I'll schedule an initial meeting for shortly after January 1.
===== Q: Will there be support for NETs who want to start a NERF but have no other nets in their immediate area? =====
A: Yes; essentially, that's the curriculum. The curriculum will assume that a NET is the only one in the service area, and it also will work for neighborhoods that have ''no'' NETs.


== Notes and References ==
== Notes and References ==

Navigation menu