2023-2024 NET Program Realignment: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 28: Line 28:
Any organizational restructuring should imply a restructuring of resources as well. Though nothing is set in stone, we should prepare ourselves to have less access to resources in the immediate future, and also prop up the [https://friendsofportlandnet.org/ Friends of Portland NET] for fundraising more if, for no other reason, than a fiscal safety mechanism. ''However'', few teams are cozy enough with their neighbors to fundraise for their teams, and PBEM/NET needs to encourage a higher level of direct engagement with neighbors at the block-scale level.
Any organizational restructuring should imply a restructuring of resources as well. Though nothing is set in stone, we should prepare ourselves to have less access to resources in the immediate future, and also prop up the [https://friendsofportlandnet.org/ Friends of Portland NET] for fundraising more if, for no other reason, than a fiscal safety mechanism. ''However'', few teams are cozy enough with their neighbors to fundraise for their teams, and PBEM/NET needs to encourage a higher level of direct engagement with neighbors at the block-scale level.


=== We need to revisit the purpose of a NET ''<u>team</u>'' ===
=== Revisiting the purpose of a NET ''team'' ===
Among the most significant change drivers, however, is a simple epiphany or two about NET.
 
==== Centralized Deployments ====
In its history, NETs have never self deployed. To review: a NET self deployment is OK'd by PBEM when two key conditions are met: 1.) a citywide disaster is taking place; and 2.) regular communication systems are not functional. When those conditions are met, the expectation is that NETs check themselves/family/immediate neighbors to make sure they're OK. If so, they deploy to their staging areas and commence their Team Operations Plans.
 
Only an earthquake, therefore, would ever prompt NETs to self deploy.<ref>...or an electromagnetic pulse (EMP). But in this stage of the conversation, I don't think it's particularly helpful to explore the horrifying implications of that. https://www.economist.com/the-world-if/2017/07/13/the-disaster-that-could-follow-from-a-flash-in-the-sky</ref>

Navigation menu