2023-2024 NET Program Realignment: Difference between revisions
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Among the most significant change drivers, however, is a simple epiphany or two about NET. | Among the most significant change drivers, however, is a simple epiphany or two about NET. | ||
==== Centralized | ==== Centralized deployments and self deployments ==== | ||
In its history, NETs have never self deployed. To review: a NET self deployment is OK'd by PBEM when two key conditions are met: 1.) a citywide disaster is taking place; and 2.) regular communication systems are not functional. When those conditions are met, the expectation is that NETs check themselves/family/immediate neighbors to make sure they're OK. If so, they deploy to their staging areas and commence their Team Operations Plans. | In its history, NETs have never self deployed. To review: a NET self deployment is OK'd by PBEM when two key conditions are met: 1.) a citywide disaster is taking place; and 2.) regular communication systems are not functional. When those conditions are met, the expectation is that NETs check themselves/family/immediate neighbors to make sure they're OK. If so, they deploy to their staging areas and commence their Team Operations Plans. | ||
Only an earthquake, therefore, would ever prompt NETs to self deploy.<ref>...or an electromagnetic pulse (EMP). But in this stage of the conversation, I don't think it's particularly helpful to explore the horrifying implications of that. https://www.economist.com/the-world-if/2017/07/13/the-disaster-that-could-follow-from-a-flash-in-the-sky</ref> | '''Only an earthquake, therefore, would ever prompt NETs to self deploy.'''<ref>...or an electromagnetic pulse (EMP). But in this stage of the conversation, I don't think it's particularly helpful to explore the horrifying implications of that. https://www.economist.com/the-world-if/2017/07/13/the-disaster-that-could-follow-from-a-flash-in-the-sky</ref> All other NET | ||
== Notes and References == | |||
Revision as of 13:17, 13 November 2023
Hello! Jeremy Van Keuren here This page is composed in the first person so I can type and edit faster.
This page presents a proposal for realigning elements of PBEM's volunteer programming (which includes NETs, BEECN, and ATVs). The objectives of these changes would be to:
- Address the fall-off of meeting attendance at routine NET Team Meetings;
- Prepare PBEM volunteer programming to meet and weather through the many changes coming to the City of Portland's government structure and the structural changes taking place at PBEM;
- Ensure programming is structured logically to meet the challenges of both climate change/extreme weather events, and the threat of a Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake;
- Encourage the growth and development of block-scale neighborhood teams.
The notion of realignment is important for this proposal. There is no intention to radically restructure PBEM volunteer programming. Instead, the intention is to better coordinate disparate parts of what we have and assemble them into a program that opens more doors to participating, from full NET volunteers to untrained neighbors.
Forces Driving Realignment
Climate change
Since NET's founding in 1994, the threat of a Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake provided the urgency behind disaster preparedness and response programming. That threat remains. But a new fighter has entered the ring: extreme weather events caused by climate change. Extreme weather, such as heat domes and snow storms, have (and will continue to) take lives and result directly in more NET volunteers deployed for more hours.
In the immediate post-COVID era, January 2022 to October 2023, NETs logged approximately 3,917 deployment hours. That includes planned deployments, such as serving as parade guides and first aid response at the Rose Festival or fire fuel mitigation. 61% of those deployment hours were logged in response to events caused by extreme weather. When I started at PBEM in 2012, that percentage was closer to 10%. And the percent attributable to extreme weather events is likely only to climb.
Organizational changes
The City of Portland is undergoing the most radical restructuring of its government in its history. Day 1 of the new government is January 1, 2025. But, organizational transformations and fluctuations will continue well beyond that date as city government settles into its new state of being. This is relevant to us as NET volunteers as all programs are more carefully scrutinized and evaluated. NET should be ready for that scrutiny and seen as one of the strongest community programs in the City (and not just as a specialized emergency response program). We show that strength by demonstrating our connections to our neighborhoods, as opposed to being a program of insular disaster responders.
As the City government changes, PBEM is simultaneously changing. We're undertaking an important reconstruction of our Operations Section. As NET volunteers have worked hard to grow the credibility of the NET program, it has become an increasingly important part of our routine emergency management response structure. For example, NET volunteers are called into the ECC/EOC to help when we have an activation. I am not aware of another CERT program that can say that.
Any organizational restructuring should imply a restructuring of resources as well. Though nothing is set in stone, we should prepare ourselves to have less access to resources in the immediate future, and also prop up the Friends of Portland NET for fundraising more if, for no other reason, than a fiscal safety mechanism. However, few teams are cozy enough with their neighbors to fundraise for their teams, and PBEM/NET needs to encourage a higher level of direct engagement with neighbors at the block-scale level.
Revisiting the purpose of a NET team
Among the most significant change drivers, however, is a simple epiphany or two about NET.
Centralized deployments and self deployments
In its history, NETs have never self deployed. To review: a NET self deployment is OK'd by PBEM when two key conditions are met: 1.) a citywide disaster is taking place; and 2.) regular communication systems are not functional. When those conditions are met, the expectation is that NETs check themselves/family/immediate neighbors to make sure they're OK. If so, they deploy to their staging areas and commence their Team Operations Plans.
Only an earthquake, therefore, would ever prompt NETs to self deploy.[1] All other NET
Notes and References
- ↑ ...or an electromagnetic pulse (EMP). But in this stage of the conversation, I don't think it's particularly helpful to explore the horrifying implications of that. https://www.economist.com/the-world-if/2017/07/13/the-disaster-that-could-follow-from-a-flash-in-the-sky