Peer Instructor Network - Revision history

GlennDevitt: /* Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) */ Added first three questions

2025-08-16T01:08:06Z

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs): Added first three questions

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 15 August 2025
Line 130:		Line 130:

	== Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) ==		== Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) ==
	''~~[Pending]~~''		'''Q1: Why are only TLs allowed to nominate instructors?'''

			A1: To help ensure quality control and accountability. TLs will have seen the nominee instruct their topic, whereas PBEM staff cannot possible individually vet every workshop.

			'''Q2: Can TLs nominate themselves?'''

			A2: No. Instruct your session for another TL's team, then have them nominate you if they wish.

			'''Q3: I need a trainer for next week's Team Meeting! Where is the list of Peer Instructors?'''

			A3: As of 2025.08.15 we do not have an ETA for publication. It will depend on the rate at which TLs nominate PIs. If we get crickets, then we won’t create a directory. If we receive 400 nominations . . . well, then, a spambot is abusing the form and it will take a while to sort out. ;-)

	== Program/Policy Background ==		== Program/Policy Background ==
	The idea for a PIN network is an outgrowth of Team Leaders' informal sharing of recommendations for volunteers who enjoy teaching NETs on various topics. PBEM acknowledged the value of this network, but also recognized two problems. ~~Namely~~, ~~is was inequitable to all~~ teams, and ~~also~~ that some ~~instructors were delivering training about which~~ they were not fully qualified or ~~informed~~.		The idea for a PIN network is an outgrowth of Team Leaders' informal sharing of recommendations for volunteers who enjoy teaching NETs on various topics. PBEM acknowledged the value of this network, but also recognized two problems. First, this did not encourage equity among teams, and second, PBEM has received complaints that some people have delivered ineffective trainings because they either were not fully qualified or did not have solid instructing skills.

GlennDevitt: /* Policy Summary: Peer Instructor Network (PIN) */ Final touches before launch announcement

2025-08-16T00:54:14Z

Policy Summary: Peer Instructor Network (PIN): Final touches before launch announcement

GlennDevitt at 00:35, 16 August 2025

2025-08-16T00:35:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 15 August 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~<u>'''2025.07.30 THIS POLICY IS ACTIVELY UNDER CONSTRUCTION; THIS PAGE IS NOT FINAL'''</u>~~

	== Policy Summary: Peer Instructor Network (PIN) ==		== Policy Summary: Peer Instructor Network (PIN) ==
	The Peer Instructor Network (PIN) is a directory of specially-qualified NETs who are vetted to provide quality training on a variety of topics. Team Leaders (TLs) may contact them directly to arrange sessions for their teams.		The Peer Instructor Network (PIN) is a directory of specially-qualified NETs who are vetted to provide quality training on a variety of topics. Team Leaders (TLs) may contact them directly to arrange sessions for their teams.

GlennDevitt: Added 'examples' section

2025-08-16T00:10:00Z

Added 'examples' section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:10, 15 August 2025
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== Policy Summary: Peer Instructor Network (PIN) ==		== Policy Summary: Peer Instructor Network (PIN) ==
	The Peer Instructor Network (PIN) is a directory of specially-qualified NETs who are vetted to provide quality training on a variety of topics. Team Leaders (TLs) may contact them directly to arrange sessions for their teams.		The Peer Instructor Network (PIN) is a directory of specially-qualified NETs who are vetted to provide quality training on a variety of topics. Team Leaders (TLs) may contact them directly to arrange sessions for their teams.

			''Examples:''

			* Joey Josephson is a NET in Woodstock who enjoys periodically leading his team through Stop the Bleed, and has a knack for teaching others whose medical training ranges from ''none'' to ''WFA''. So his Team Leader asks if Joey would be willing to instruct other NET teams in the city as part of his volunteer service. Joey agrees, and his TL nominates him. PBEM takes it from there.
			* Pat Patrickson loves camping and cooking over a fire. They offer to demonstrate some backcountry food prep techniques and recipes to their team, and the conviviality of the session is a real hit. Their TL asks if they would be willing to repeat the session for other teams as a volunteer, and nominates them as a Peer Instructor. Pat writes up a brief summary and agenda for the session. PBEM follows up, and soon NETs across the city are make the Best Campfire Burgers Ever. (But only during months when there is no [https://multco.us/info/wood-burning-restrictions#section-1 burn ban], of course.)

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	\|+		\|+
	\|'''Effective date'''		\|'''Effective date'''
	\|~~NOT YET FINALIZED~~		\|2025.08.15
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''Last revised'''		\|'''Last revised'''
	\|2025.07.30		\|2025.08.15
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''Policy owner'''		\|'''Policy owner'''

Net@portlandoregon.gov: /* Peer Instructor (PI) Intake Procedure */

2025-08-06T22:08:30Z

Peer Instructor (PI) Intake Procedure

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:08, 6 August 2025
Line 86:		Line 86:
	## The Nominee may be qualified based on professional accreditation, or personal experience, or research they have accomplished, etc. PBEM is not putting strict rules around credentials because		## The Nominee may be qualified based on professional accreditation, or personal experience, or research they have accomplished, etc. PBEM is not putting strict rules around credentials because
	### many useful NET topics do not have a formal path to SME status, and		### many useful NET topics do not have a formal path to SME status, and
	### subjects that do generally will not be part of this informal PIN. For example, CPR, Hazmat, and [[Wilderness First Aid (WFA)]].		### subjects that generally will not be part of this informal PIN. For example, CPR, Hazmat, and [[Wilderness First Aid (WFA)]].
	## The nominating Team Leader must have observed the Nominee teach the entire session at least once or twice to local NETs (or at [https://netcamp.net NET Camp]).		## The nominating Team Leader must have observed the Nominee teach the entire session at least once or twice to local NETs (or at [https://netcamp.net NET Camp]).
	## '''Quality control will be TLs' and PBEM's shared responsibility.''' It is crucial to bear in mind that '''nomination by a TL means that they personally vouch to other TLs''' for:		## '''Quality control will be TLs' and PBEM's shared responsibility.''' It is crucial to bear in mind that '''nomination by a TL means that they personally vouch to other TLs''' for:

Net@portlandoregon.gov: /* Definitions */

2025-08-06T22:06:44Z

Definitions

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:06, 6 August 2025
Line 74:		Line 74:
	\|-		\|-
	\|Subject Natter Expert (SME)		\|Subject Natter Expert (SME)
	\|~~<mark>~~An individual with in-depth, specialized knowledge and experience in a particular field or area~~</mark>~~. They possess a high level of expertise, often gained through formal education, practical experience, or a combination of both, and are considered go-to resources for their specialized knowledge.		\|An individual with in-depth, specialized knowledge and experience in a particular field or area. They possess a high level of expertise, often gained through formal education, practical experience, or a combination of both, and are considered go-to resources for their specialized knowledge.
	\|-		\|-
	\|[[Volunteer Support Functions Introduction and Directory\|Volunteer Support Function (VSF)]]		\|[[Volunteer Support Functions Introduction and Directory\|Volunteer Support Function (VSF)]]

Net@portlandoregon.gov: /* Definitions */

2025-08-06T22:06:29Z

Definitions

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:06, 6 August 2025
Line 72:		Line 72:
	\|Neighborhood Emergency Team (NET)		\|Neighborhood Emergency Team (NET)
	\|A community-based group of volunteer disaster responders whose members are trained and certified by the Portland Bureau of Emergency Management.		\|A community-based group of volunteer disaster responders whose members are trained and certified by the Portland Bureau of Emergency Management.
			\|-
			\|Subject Natter Expert (SME)
			\|<mark>An individual with in-depth, specialized knowledge and experience in a particular field or area</mark>. They possess a high level of expertise, often gained through formal education, practical experience, or a combination of both, and are considered go-to resources for their specialized knowledge.
	\|-		\|-
	\|[[Volunteer Support Functions Introduction and Directory\|Volunteer Support Function (VSF)]]		\|[[Volunteer Support Functions Introduction and Directory\|Volunteer Support Function (VSF)]]

GlennDevitt at 05:21, 31 July 2025

2025-07-31T05:21:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:21, 30 July 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<u>'''2025.07.30 THIS POLICY IS ~~ACTIVLY~~ UNDER CONSTRUCTION; THIS PAGE IS NOT FINAL'''</u>		<u>'''2025.07.30 THIS POLICY IS ACTIVELY UNDER CONSTRUCTION; THIS PAGE IS NOT FINAL'''</u>

	== Policy Summary: Peer Instructor Network (PIN) ==		== Policy Summary: Peer Instructor Network (PIN) ==

GlennDevitt: /* Access and General Expectations of ATVs */ Completed v1.0

2025-07-31T05:14:12Z

Access and General Expectations of ATVs: Completed v1.0

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 30 July 2025
Line 33:		Line 33:
	* Provides Team Leaders and CRD Training Officers ([[Volunteer Support Functions Directory#VSF 05: Planning/Command\|VSF 05.10]]) a cadre of vetted, knowledgeable instructors to deliver training to NET volunteers on topics which do not require formal testing or certification.		* Provides Team Leaders and CRD Training Officers ([[Volunteer Support Functions Directory#VSF 05: Planning/Command\|VSF 05.10]]) a cadre of vetted, knowledgeable instructors to deliver training to NET volunteers on topics which do not require formal testing or certification.
	* Creates opportunities for Active NET volunteers to develop skills as Instructors, in areas that interest them.		* Creates opportunities for Active NET volunteers to develop skills as Instructors, in areas that interest them.
	* Creates opportunities for approved ~~PIN trainers~~ to mentor others. Each one teach one!		* Creates opportunities for approved Peer Instructors (PIs) to mentor others. Each one teach one!
	* Develops a pool of competent instructors who deliver high-quality Advance Training.		* Develops a pool of competent instructors who deliver high-quality Advance Training.
	* Provides more Advanced Training opportunities for NET volunteers to meet their [[Minimum Service Contribution (MSC)]] requirement.		* Provides more Advanced Training opportunities for NET volunteers to meet their [[Minimum Service Contribution (MSC)]] requirement.
Line 39:		Line 39:

	=== Policy Statement ===		=== Policy Statement ===
	Approved participants in the Peer Instructor Network (PIN) are Active NETs with specialized skills or experience, who have been nominated by a Team Leader who attests to their knowledge and competence, and are then approved by PBEM to deliver high-quality Advanced Training. ~~PIN trainers~~ will teach classes at no charge to their fellow volunteers, and log related time toward their [[Minimum Service Contribution (MSC)]].		Approved participants in the Peer Instructor Network (PIN) are Active NETs with specialized skills or experience, who have been nominated by a Team Leader who attests to their knowledge and competence, and are then approved by PBEM to deliver high-quality Advanced Training. Peer Instructors (PIs) will teach classes at no charge to their fellow volunteers, and log related time toward their [[Minimum Service Contribution (MSC)]].

	=== Scope ===		=== Scope ===
Line 45:		Line 45:

	* Active NET Volunteers who wish to teach specific topics to other volunteers		* Active NET Volunteers who wish to teach specific topics to other volunteers
	* Team Leaders who nominate and vouch for ~~PIN trainers~~.		* Team Leaders who nominate and vouch for PIs.
	* Team Leaders who wish to arrange classes for their team with ~~PIN trainers~~.		* Team Leaders who wish to arrange classes for their team with Peer Instructors.
	* Once successfully launched, the program might be expanded to include [[Affiliated Team Volunteers (ATVs)]].		* Once successfully launched, the program might be expanded to include [[Affiliated Team Volunteers (ATVs)]].

Line 52:		Line 52:

	; Portland Bureau of Emergency Management (PBEM)		; Portland Bureau of Emergency Management (PBEM)
	: Vets and approves ~~PIN trainers~~ nominated by Team Leaders. Tracks ~~PIN trainers~~ in the volunteer database, ensures background checks, periodically reviews feedback about ~~PIN trainers~~' performance, and ~~communicated~~ program updates.		: Vets and approves PIs nominated by Team Leaders. Tracks Peer Instructors in the volunteer database, ensures background checks, periodically reviews feedback about PIs' performance, and communicates program updates.
	; Team Leaders		; Team Leaders
	: Recruit, interview, evaluate, and nominate ~~PIN trainers~~. Use the PIN ~~trainer~~ directory to arrange Advanced Training sessions for their teams.		: Recruit, interview, evaluate, and nominate Peer Instructors. Use the PIN directory to arrange Advanced Training sessions for their teams.
	; ~~PIN Trainers~~		; Peer Instructors (PIs)
	: Develop and keep current curriculum on the topic(s) they are approved to teach. Fulfill reasonable requests from Team Leaders to deliver their approved training(s). Comport themselves professionally, and seek feedback from their students.		: Develop and keep current curriculum on the topic(s) they are approved to teach. Fulfill reasonable requests from Team Leaders to deliver their approved training(s) to NET volunteers for free. Comport themselves professionally, and seek constructive feedback from their students.

	=== Definitions ===		=== Definitions ===
Line 79:		Line 79:
	== Implementation Details ==		== Implementation Details ==

	=== ~~Access and General Expectations of ATVs~~ ===		=== Peer Instructor (PI) Intake Procedure ===
			# '''Only Team Leaders''' '''nominate potential PIs''' to teach on specific topics on which they are a subject matter expert (SME), using the [https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/25ad245ac1b34788acf9cbb7332574fe nomination form].
			## The Nominee may be qualified based on professional accreditation, or personal experience, or research they have accomplished, etc. PBEM is not putting strict rules around credentials because
			### many useful NET topics do not have a formal path to SME status, and
			### subjects that do generally will not be part of this informal PIN. For example, CPR, Hazmat, and [[Wilderness First Aid (WFA)]].
			## The nominating Team Leader must have observed the Nominee teach the entire session at least once or twice to local NETs (or at [https://netcamp.net NET Camp]).
			## '''Quality control will be TLs' and PBEM's shared responsibility.''' It is crucial to bear in mind that '''nomination by a TL means that they personally vouch to other TLs''' for:
			### the Nominee’s '''quality of information and curriculum''', and
			### the Nominee’s '''effectiveness as an instructor'''.
			# PBEM will evaluate the nominations and have the final approval of each class topic and Nominee.
			# PBEM will compile and maintain the online directory, including contact information for each Peer Instructor.

	~~# ccc~~		=== Scheduling of PIN Trainings ===
			TLs will use the online PIN directory to contact PIs and plan trainings for their local team. When critical mass for a class cannot be met by a team, joint trainings should be discussed with nearby TLs.

	=== ~~ATV Intake Procedure~~ ===		=== Payment ===
	~~'''For former Active NET volunteers'''~~

	# ~~Inform~~ the [~~https://pbem~~.~~link/net-team-map Team Leader] of your intention to~~		# Peer Instructors must teach as volunteers, and may neither solicit nor accept compensation of any kind including honoraria.
			# PIs must [[Portal FAQ\|log their time]] in the volunteer database, to be counted toward their [[Minimum Service Contribution (MSC)]].

	*Team Leaders – and '''only Team Leaders''' – will use an online form to '''nominate potential Peer Instructors ~~(PIs)'''~~ to teach ~~specific topic on which they are a subject matter expert~~ (~~SME~~).		=== Supplies & Equipment ===
	*# ~~The nominee may~~ be ~~qualified based on professional accreditation, or personal experience, or research they have accomplished, etc. I’m not putting a lot~~ of ~~formal rules around credentials for this~~. ~~Many useful NET topics do not have a formal path to SME status, and those that do generally will not be part~~ of ~~this informal network. (For example~~, ~~Hazmat, CPR, and WFA~~.)
	*# '''~~You must have seen the nominee teach the session~~'~~'' at least once or twice to local NETs (or at NET Camp) in order to attest that they are a good instructor. This is not a popularity contest~~.		# Peer Instructors must list all equipment or consumables required to teach their class(es) when being vetted by PBEM for the PIN program, because:
	*# ~~'''Quality control will be your and my shared responsibility.''' The most important thing~~ to ~~know is~~ that ~~'''you~~ will ~~be personally vouching to~~ other ~~TLs''' for 1) your nominee’s '''quality of information'''~~, ~~and 2) your nominee’s '''effectiveness as an instructor'''~~. ~~Not every SME is a good instructor~~, and ~~not even the best instructor has the knowledge~~ to ~~teach every topic. I’m not throwing shade, I am simply recognizing that no one excels at everything,~~ and teaching ~~adults requires a particular skillset~~. ~~I am looking to you to nominate people who hit~~ the ~~nexus, because a directory of poor Peer Instructors~~ will ~~not~~ be ~~useful~~ to ~~anyone.~~		# All supplies needed for trainings must be purchased by PBEM under City of Portland procurement contracts and supplied to the PI.
	* PBEM will evaluate ~~the nominations~~ and ~~compile~~ the ~~online directory, including contact info for each Peer Instructor~~.		# In compliance with City of Portland policy, PBEM cannot reimburse PIs for any expenditures.
	* TLs may then use that ~~directory any time~~ to ~~reach out and plan trainings for your team – or better yet, plan a joint training with neighboring TLs.~~		# PIs are ''strongly'' discouraged from spending personal funds on class consumables.
	* I do not have an ETA for publication. It will depend on the ~~rate at which you nominate PIs. If I get crickets, then we won’t create a~~ directory. ~~If I get 400 nominations . . . well, then, a spambot is abusing the form and it will take a while to sort out. ;-)~~		# PIs may choose to purchase or construct durable training equipment that they will reuse for other purposes, but only after first asking whether PBEM can supply it.

			=== Feedback & Maintenance ===

			# Peer Instructors are encouraged to solicit constructive feedback from their classes, and use it to improve their curriculum and teaching skills.
			# PBEM will also capture feedback using compulsory fields when each NET logs their time for the training. That feedback will be used to evaluate individual PIs and the entire program periodically.
			# Periodically PBEM will survey PIs via email to confirm that they wish to continue to be listed in the PIN online directory.

	== Compliance ==		== Compliance ==
	~~PIN trainers~~ who do not respond to Team Leader communications may be removed from the PIN directory. Volunteers who violate this policy or the [[PBEM Volunteer Code of Conduct\|Code of Conduct]] may face dismissal from the program.		Peer Instructors are required to maintain Active NET status and meet their annual [[Minimum Service Contribution (MSC)]]. Peer Instructors who do not respond to Team Leader or PBEM communications may be removed from the PIN directory. Volunteers who violate this policy or the [[PBEM Volunteer Code of Conduct\|Code of Conduct]] may face dismissal from the program.

	== Related Information ==		== Related Information ==
Line 107:		Line 124:
	== Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) ==		== Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) ==

	===== Q: ~~How will ?~~ =====		===== Q: ________ =====
	''A: ~~Roles w~~''		''A: ________''

	== Program/Policy Background ==		== Program/Policy Background ==
	The idea for a PIN network is an outgrowth of Team Leaders' informal network of sharing recommendations of volunteers who enjoy teaching NETs on various topics. PBEM recognized the value of this network, but also the fact that is was inequitable to all teams, and that some instructors were delivering training about which they were not fully qualified or informed.		The idea for a PIN network is an outgrowth of Team Leaders' informal network of sharing recommendations of volunteers who enjoy teaching NETs on various topics. PBEM recognized the value of this network, but also the fact that is was inequitable to all teams, and that some instructors were delivering training about which they were not fully qualified or informed.

GlennDevitt at 01:35, 31 July 2025

2025-07-31T01:35:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:35, 30 July 2025
Line 63:		Line 63:
	!Term		!Term
	!Definition		!Definition
			\|-
			\|Advanced Training
			\|Sessions available to Active NETs after the completion of Basic NET Training, in order to develop their emergency response skills and improve personal safety.
	\|-		\|-
	\|[[Affiliated Team Volunteers (ATVs)\|Affiliated Team Volunteer (ATV)]]		\|[[Affiliated Team Volunteers (ATVs)\|Affiliated Team Volunteer (ATV)]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:54, 15 August 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:
	''Examples:''		''Examples:''

	* Joey Josephson is a NET in Woodstock who enjoys periodically leading ~~his~~ team through Stop the Bleed, and has a knack for teaching others whose medical training ranges from ''~~none~~'' to ''WFA''. So ~~his~~ Team Leader asks if Joey would be willing to instruct other NET teams in the city as part of ~~his~~ volunteer service. Joey agrees, and ~~his~~ TL nominates ~~him~~. PBEM takes it from there.		* Joey Josephson is a NET in Woodstock who enjoys periodically leading her team through Stop the Bleed, and has a knack for teaching others whose NET medical training ranges from ''Basic NET'' to ''WFA-certified''. So her Team Leader asks if Joey would be willing to instruct other NET teams in the city as part of her volunteer service. Joey agrees, and her TL nominates her. PBEM takes it from there.
	* Pat Patrickson loves camping and cooking over a fire. They offer to demonstrate some backcountry food prep techniques and recipes to their team, and the conviviality of the session is a real hit. Their TL asks if they would ~~be willing~~ to repeat the session for other teams as a volunteer, and nominates them as a Peer Instructor. Pat writes up a ~~brief summary~~ and agenda for the session. PBEM follows up, and soon NETs across the city are ~~make~~ the Best Campfire ~~Burgers~~ Ever. (But only during months when there is no [https://multco.us/info/wood-burning-restrictions#section-1 burn ban], of course.)		* Pat Patrickson loves camping and cooking over a fire. They offer to demonstrate some backcountry food prep techniques and recipes to their team, and the conviviality of the session is a real hit. Pat does not have an actual workshop outline or much experience training others, so their technical presentation is a bit rough around the edges. Their TL asks if they would like to repeat and refine the session, with the goal of polishing it for presentation to other teams as a volunteer. If the TL is even more impressed the second (or third) time, they ask if Pat feels ready to be endorsed, and then nominates them as a Peer Instructor. Pat writes up a blurb and agenda for the session. PBEM follows up, and soon NETs across the city are making the Best Campfire Beanburgers Ever. (But only during months when there is no [https://multco.us/info/wood-burning-restrictions#section-1 burn ban], of course.)

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
Line 35:		Line 35:
	The Peer Instructor Network (PIN) supports Neighborhood Emergency Teams (NET) by improving availability and diversity of Advanced Training in the program. Specifically it:		The Peer Instructor Network (PIN) supports Neighborhood Emergency Teams (NET) by improving availability and diversity of Advanced Training in the program. Specifically it:

	* Provides Team Leaders and CRD Training Officers ([[Volunteer Support Functions Directory#VSF 05: Planning/Command\|VSF 05.10]]) a cadre of vetted, knowledgeable instructors to deliver training to NET volunteers on topics which do not require formal testing or certification.		* Provides Team Leaders and CRD Training Officers ([[Volunteer Support Functions Directory#VSF 05: Planning/Command\|VSF 05.10]]) a cadre of vetted, knowledgeable instructors to deliver training to NET volunteers on topics which ''do not require formal testing nor bestow a certification''.
	* Creates opportunities for Active NET volunteers to develop skills as Instructors, in areas that interest them.		* Creates opportunities for Active NET volunteers to develop skills as Instructors, in areas that interest them.
	* Creates opportunities for approved Peer Instructors (PIs) to mentor others. Each one teach one!		* Creates opportunities for approved Peer Instructors (PIs) to mentor others. Each one teach one!
Line 56:		Line 56:

	; Portland Bureau of Emergency Management (PBEM)		; Portland Bureau of Emergency Management (PBEM)
	: Vets and approves PIs nominated by Team Leaders. Tracks Peer Instructors in the volunteer database, ensures background checks, periodically reviews feedback about PIs' performance, and communicates program updates.		: Vets and approves PIs nominated by Team Leaders. Tracks Peer Instructors in the volunteer database, ensures background checks, periodically reviews feedback about PIs' performance, and communicates program updates. Adds MIP signup Opportunities for PI's training sessions; these Opportunities may be limited to specific teams at the request of the scheduling TL.
	; Team Leaders		; Team Leaders
	: Recruit, interview, evaluate, and nominate Peer Instructors. Use the PIN directory to arrange Advanced Training sessions for their teams.		: Recruit, interview, evaluate, and nominate Peer Instructors. Use the PIN directory to arrange Advanced Training sessions for their teams.
Line 77:		Line 77:
	\|A community-based group of volunteer disaster responders whose members are trained and certified by the Portland Bureau of Emergency Management.		\|A community-based group of volunteer disaster responders whose members are trained and certified by the Portland Bureau of Emergency Management.
	\|-		\|-
	\|Subject ~~Natter~~ Expert (SME)		\|Subject Matter Expert (SME)
	\|An individual with in-depth, specialized knowledge and experience in a particular field or area. They possess a high level of expertise, often gained through formal education, practical experience, or a combination of both, and are considered go-to resources for their specialized knowledge.		\|An individual with in-depth, specialized knowledge and experience in a particular field or area. They possess a high level of expertise, often gained through formal education, practical experience, or a combination of both, and are considered go-to resources for their specialized knowledge.
	\|-		\|-
Line 87:		Line 87:

	=== Peer Instructor (PI) Intake Procedure ===		=== Peer Instructor (PI) Intake Procedure ===
	# '''Only Team Leaders''' '''nominate potential PIs''' to teach on specific topics on which they are a subject matter expert (SME), using the [https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/25ad245ac1b34788acf9cbb7332574fe nomination form].		# '''Only Team Leaders may''' '''nominate potential PIs''' to teach on specific topics on which they are a subject matter expert (SME), using the [https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/25ad245ac1b34788acf9cbb7332574fe nomination form].
	## The Nominee may be qualified based on professional accreditation, or personal experience, or research they have accomplished, etc. PBEM is not putting strict rules around credentials because		## The Nominee may be qualified based on professional accreditation, or personal experience, or research they have accomplished, etc. PBEM is not putting strict rules around credentials because
	### many useful NET topics do not have a formal path to SME status, and		### many useful NET topics do not have a formal path to SME status, and
	### subjects that ~~generally~~ will not be part of this informal PIN. For example, CPR, Hazmat, and [[Wilderness First Aid (WFA)]].		### subjects that do require formal accreditation will not be part of this informal PIN. For example, CPR, Hazmat awareness, and [[Wilderness First Aid (WFA)]].
	## The nominating Team Leader must have observed the Nominee teach the entire session at least once or twice to local NETs (or at [https://netcamp.net NET Camp]).		## The nominating Team Leader must have observed the Nominee teach the entire session effectively at least once or twice to local NETs (or at [https://netcamp.net NET Camp]).
	## '''Quality control will be TLs' and PBEM's shared responsibility.''' It is crucial to bear in mind that '''nomination by a TL means that they personally vouch to other TLs''' for:		## '''Quality control will be TLs' and PBEM's shared responsibility.''' It is crucial to bear in mind that '''nomination by a TL means that they personally vouch to other TLs''' for:
	### the Nominee’s '''quality of information and curriculum''', and		### the Nominee’s '''quality of information and curriculum''', ''and''
	### the Nominee’s '''effectiveness as an instructor'''.		### the Nominee’s '''effectiveness as an instructor'''.
	# PBEM will evaluate the nominations and have the final approval of each class topic and Nominee.		# PBEM will evaluate the nominations and have the final approval of each class topic and Nominee.
Line 112:		Line 112:
	# In compliance with City of Portland policy, PBEM cannot reimburse PIs for any expenditures.		# In compliance with City of Portland policy, PBEM cannot reimburse PIs for any expenditures.
	# PIs are ''strongly'' discouraged from spending personal funds on class consumables.		# PIs are ''strongly'' discouraged from spending personal funds on class consumables.
	# PIs may choose to purchase or construct durable training equipment that they will reuse for other purposes, but only after first ~~asking~~ whether PBEM can supply it.		# PIs may choose to purchase or construct durable training equipment that they will reuse for other purposes, but only after asking first whether PBEM can supply it.

	=== Feedback & Maintenance ===		=== Feedback & Maintenance ===
Line 121:		Line 121:

	== Compliance ==		== Compliance ==
	Peer Instructors are required to maintain Active NET status and meet their annual [[Minimum Service Contribution (MSC)]]. Peer Instructors who do not respond to Team Leader or PBEM communications may be removed from the PIN directory. Volunteers who violate this policy or the [[PBEM Volunteer Code of Conduct\|Code of Conduct]] may ~~face dismissal~~ from the program.		Peer Instructors are required to maintain Active NET status and meet their annual [[Minimum Service Contribution (MSC)]]. Peer Instructors who do not respond to Team Leader or PBEM communications may be removed from the PIN directory. Volunteers who violate this policy or the [[PBEM Volunteer Code of Conduct\|Code of Conduct]] may be removed from the PIN, or be dismissed from the program.

	== Related Information ==		== Related Information ==
Line 130:		Line 130:

	== Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) ==		== Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) ==
			''[Pending]''
	~~===== Q: ________ =====~~
	''~~A: ________~~''

	== Program/Policy Background ==		== Program/Policy Background ==
	The idea for a PIN network is an outgrowth of Team Leaders' informal ~~network~~ of ~~sharing~~ recommendations of volunteers who enjoy teaching NETs on various topics. PBEM ~~recognized~~ the value of this network, but also ~~the fact that~~ is was inequitable to all teams, and that some instructors were delivering training about which they were not fully qualified or informed.		The idea for a PIN network is an outgrowth of Team Leaders' informal sharing of recommendations for volunteers who enjoy teaching NETs on various topics. PBEM acknowledged the value of this network, but also recognized two problems. Namely, is was inequitable to all teams, and also that some instructors were delivering training about which they were not fully qualified or informed.